Example: Now: 25/8/08

(25/8/08 6:57PM Radio on; news on killing, bombings, terrorist around the world, etc, etc)

It is six months now where there is so much news happening around which does not really make sense. How did spurred and how did investigations and interpretations go weird where it did not even prove a thing and catastrophes just explodes in chains?

Ok. Human handling error information. In and out. What fed in and what came out. If a tree falls downs in the forest, would there be a sound? If I ask you what sound it is. Boom, bush, blang, etc, if we measure in sound waves, it would be decibels, if we measure in words it would be numerical, whatever it is. So the impericals of the human own measurements is also wrong. When the person is emotional, it would also give a different aspect on the measurement. If the environment of the falling tree is underwater also gives a different mean to what it is meant. If the person is confuse, it also gives a different mean.

The question is: what means of that point of time am I am giving to whom on what statement and why; given in what I had said so much or so little in the blogs I had said.

Second question: who knows the exact truth and from which sources really referring to?

Third question: what is the testing environment that has been referencing to the person at that present point of time and being.

Fourth question: how did it cause this ripple effect of result?

Fifth question: what should really be the limits and boundaries of testing environment in future when similar occurrences happens.

Sixth question: what should be the standards for everyone to really know and understand so to keep the current system running and just to sort out the current problem.

Problematic 5: human error in fear relative to our perceptions (ie. our own senses) I am not God. One thing that is true. I do not know everything. I do not know the best solution. I do not know what is happening. Again. Chicken and egg. It is the matter of who said the statement chicken and egg really arises the chicken and egg that we imagine. Or the tree example of what I had said earlier ago.

Does this really solve the problem of what has been arise hand? Keeping things contain in this testing environment and how to move present information without going into some sort of different tunneling visions and not really getting from the primary source at hand.

(7:42PM Stretching in sore-throat, feeling over worked, listening to TV soapies on talking the other gender; listening about a person angry-ness about the guy and the girl; 7:50PM just watch a partial episode of this TV-Series about a gay guy, the girl  (concubine)who has his brother’s baby, the brother who has a wife confronting his concubine (and is pissed on the confrontation) and with the dad and how they confront with the problems ahead. Theme: rich, respect within the family, understand moral of the story)

This gives me arises on the how it really shapes our own perceptions on how we generally accept things on who is the bad guy, who is the good guy and who is the middle guy. Gay guy solves the problem. Being gay is un-respected in his family but what he does is understandable because he is helping the concubine to solve her problems without further problems going ahead. Concubine: having emotional problems on relationship of having baby and keeping the relationship with the person who she love, the brother who wanted to keep the respect in the family but does un-respected thing within what he loves as well and did not suggest he have family problems with his wife (probably meant he wanted to keep everything and prove to dad and brother that he is capable - I would leave the ordering matter behind) and the dad which I presume he did not even know anything or knows everything but in order to keep the family just acts as normal until things arises.

Lets go and ask in a eating fashion does it mean that? (Arising Problematic 6: Eating builds crosses? (if it is reference to eating - maybe arises to eating and language disorder when we eat and talk at the same time..??) - preferably say someone is trying to build a cross in our eating habits in reference to language because it supposably be Round? Is it a barrier in humans??)

So going back to the theme I had said. Is everything understandable? It is bias favor in the gay guy which is already a cross in the family, not favor for the brother which is already a cross in the family, favor in the concubine which is already a cross in the family, favor in the dad which is already a cross in the family. Having a general accepted theme is already a cross. Are we missing information in mentioning these crosses? If we know so much crosses in the missing information given should we have taken the move in the first place?

(8:19PM Feeling a bit sick currently; sore-throat)
Problematic 7: We-You-I : occurance as Trinity; effecting in you, i, we.
Problematic 8: Ordering discrepancy. I, we, you; We, you, I … arises alot of possibilities. Funny thing is Ordering is taken from the change of tone, the change of heart. Imagine what was written is a mix bag and ask people to choose from this mix bag what is the best solution to the problem. No one knows what is the best solution and the worse solution?
Problematic 9: Given in knowing and not knowing and the time it arises to the time it falls. Time shifting, occurring in time, again and again; missing information.

(8:34PM 25/8/08 Continue on tomorrow. Time for sleep )

Here give something hints mix the Problematic number; what emotions does it arise; mix the paragraphs together; what does it arise, mix each sentence of words together; what does it arises? Then what is move?

One Response to “Example: Now: 25/8/08”

  1. Tovi Says:

    Good for people to know.

Leave a Reply